Reviewer Guidelines
Guidelines, expectations, and support for peer reviewers at ASIRS Conference Proceedings
Peer review is the cornerstone of academic integrity. At ASIRS Conference, we deeply value the contributions of our reviewers. We are committed to providing a smooth, efficient, and rewarding review experience through our AI-enhanced OJS platform, clear guidelines, and responsive editorial support. Your expertise helps us maintain the highest standards of quality and rigor across all our conference proceedings.
Peer Review Process
How the review workflow works from invitation to completion
Invitation
You receive an email invitation with manuscript details and deadline
Accept/Decline
Accept if you have the expertise and time. Decline with reason if unavailable
Review
Download the manuscript and use our structured template for your evaluation
Recommendation
Submit your review with a clear recommendation: accept, revise, or reject
Completion
The editor makes the final decision. You receive acknowledgment and recognition
Reviewer Guidelines
What we expect from reviewers and how we support you
Review Criteria
- Originality and significance of the research
- Clarity and quality of the writing
- Methodological rigor and validity
- Soundness of conclusions and interpretation
- Ethical compliance and proper citations
- Appropriateness for the conference scope
Ethical Responsibilities
- Maintain confidentiality at all times
- Declare any conflicts of interest
- Avoid personal criticism of the author
- Do not use unpublished work for your own research
- Follow COPE guidelines for ethical review
- Respect author anonymity in double-blind review
AI-Powered Reviewer Matching
Our platform uses intelligent algorithms to match manuscripts with the most suitable reviewers
Researcher profiles in our proprietary database
Integrated data for global research visibility
Intelligent matching based on expertise and review history
Reviewer Benefits & Recognition
Professional Development
Access to reviewer training resources, structured templates, and COPE-aligned guidelines to enhance your reviewing skills.
Recognition
Official acknowledgment on conference websites, and the option to have your reviewing activity credited on ORCID and Publons.
Networking
Opportunities to join program committees, connect with editors and fellow reviewers, and participate in academic events.
Frequently Asked Questions for Reviewers
How long do I have to complete a review?
The standard review deadline is 3-4 weeks from the date of invitation. If you need more time, please contact the editorial office to request an extension.
What should I do if I have a conflict of interest?
Decline the review invitation immediately and inform the editorial office of the conflict. Confidentiality is paramount.
Is the review process truly double-blind?
Yes. Author identities are hidden from reviewers and reviewer identities are hidden from authors throughout the process. The editorial team ensures all identifying information is removed before review.
Will I receive feedback on my reviews?
Yes. Editors may provide feedback on review quality. The conference also shares the final decision and author response to the review, helping you learn from the process.
How can I become a reviewer for ASIRS Conference Proceedings?
You can express interest by contacting the editorial office of ASIRS Conference Proceedings. We welcome applications from active researchers with a doctoral degree and a strong publication record in their field.
Join Our Reviewer Community
We are always looking for qualified reviewers to support our conference proceedings and maintain the highest standards of academic integrity.
2027 ASIRS Conference Proceedings. All rights reserved.
Published as part of the ASIRS Conference Proceedings series.
Contact: info@starnexus.press